Page 1 of 46 1231131 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 455

Thread: 2 kwts discreet class d need help

  1. #1
    diysmps Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Langata Rongai, Rift Valley, Kenya, Kenya
    Posts
    380

    Red face 2 kwts discreet class d need help

    hi guys i have constructed and have been using this ucd amp based for quite some time . i wanted to juice it up to use multiple output like 4 pairs of irfp250 / ifrp260 or 3pairs of irf540 like in iraud 9amp with 250and 260 i wanted to do +/-72vlts at 4 to 2 ohms i dont have ociloscope or don't know how to go about one. much participation will be appreciated. stewin
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Attached Files Attached Files

  2. #2
    diysmps Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Langata Rongai, Rift Valley, Kenya, Kenya
    Posts
    380
    i am using +/- 45vlts cause of irf540 voltage ratings.
    i had written +/- 80vlts on the schema hoping to get my hands on a cool fet like irfb4227

  3. #3
    diysmps Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, MY
    Posts
    571
    hmmm, to go with high power, this circuit is too complicated. u can use simple one with ir2110 and can go such as power by using right mosfet. or drive it as fullbridge. btw this circuit is discrete, did u build it stewin?

  4. #4
    diysmps Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Langata Rongai, Rift Valley, Kenya, Kenya
    Posts
    380
    yes i have built it it works. and has not been disturbing me with noise issues. i like discreet because when it fails or burns i only replace one or two 2n5404 near the outputs and the outputs them selves unlike using ir2110 . i have to replace the output everytime plus the expensive ir2110 ic every time something goes wrong.

  5. #5
    diysmps Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, MY
    Posts
    571
    agreed with IR2110 is expensive, discrete just need more work to do but you can save $$, i have few schema with discrete component and i do simu with LTspice seems work good. I think i will build it when i have time here i leave schema maybe anyone interested.
    Attached Files Attached Files

  6. #6
    diysmps Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, MY
    Posts
    571
    hi stewin,

    here is the result with LTspice, i do modification from original schematic because original one have 1.3% thd and offset is 98mvdc. so this is result for the modified one and i`ve free time today i`ll make one board for it, i wanna test it how this amp working and how stable it is.

    Tested mosfet IRFP250N, with +-/- 48 vdc, output voltage +/- 32 vac 8 ampere. 4 ohm load. Dc offset only 0.004vdc.
    Starting source stepping with srcstepmethod=0
    Source Step = 3.0303%
    Source Step = 9.84848%
    Source Step = 17.4242%
    Source Step = 25%
    Source Step = 32.5758%
    Source Step = 40.1515%
    vernier = 0.375
    Source Step = 50.7576%
    Source Step = 62.1212%
    Source Step = 73.4848%
    Source Step = 84.8485%
    Source Step = 96.2121%
    vernier = 0.5625
    Source stepping succeeded in finding the operating point.

    Fourier components of V(out)
    DC component:0.004799

    Harmonic Frequency Fourier Normalized Phase Normalized
    Number [Hz] Component Component [degree] Phase [deg]
    1 1.000e+02 3.135e+01 1.000e+00 -123.45 0.00
    2 2.000e+02 3.292e-03 1.050e-04 56.05 179.50
    3 3.000e+02 3.236e-02 1.032e-03 -166.58 -43.13
    4 4.000e+02 2.101e-03 6.702e-05 148.97 272.42
    5 5.000e+02 2.386e-02 7.612e-04 -61.54 61.92
    6 6.000e+02 2.849e-04 9.087e-06 76.29 199.74
    7 7.000e+02 1.236e-02 3.944e-04 47.00 170.45
    8 8.000e+02 4.671e-04 1.490e-05 10.87 134.33
    9 9.000e+02 8.908e-03 2.841e-04 157.27 280.72
    Total Harmonic Distortion: 0.137746%


    Fourier components of V(in)
    DC component:-3.3813e-011

    Harmonic Frequency Fourier Normalized Phase Normalized
    Number [Hz] Component Component [degree] Phase [deg]
    1 1.000e+02 2.000e+00 1.000e+00 -0.00 0.00
    2 2.000e+02 1.188e-10 5.939e-11 -171.43 -171.43
    3 3.000e+02 2.156e-10 1.078e-10 163.34 163.34
    4 4.000e+02 6.074e-11 3.037e-11 78.61 78.61
    5 5.000e+02 1.227e-10 6.136e-11 -2.60 -2.60
    6 6.000e+02 5.527e-11 2.763e-11 113.55 113.55
    7 7.000e+02 1.044e-10 5.218e-11 51.52 51.52
    8 8.000e+02 2.053e-10 1.026e-10 -33.31 -33.31
    9 9.000e+02 1.105e-10 5.525e-11 -161.60 -161.60
    Total Harmonic Distortion: 0.000000%



    Date: Fri Feb 24 12:19:12 2012
    Total elapsed time: 1037.290 seconds.

    tnom = 27
    temp = 27
    method = modified trap
    totiter = 17672589
    traniter = 17670226
    tranpoints = 4732823
    accept = 3348150
    rejected = 1384673
    matrix size = 96
    fillins = 202
    solver = Normal
    Matrix Compiler1: 23.3 KB object code size 9.0/5.9/[2.5]
    Matrix Compiler2: off [3.0]/3.6/16.1

  7. #7
    diysmps Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Langata Rongai, Rift Valley, Kenya, Kenya
    Posts
    380
    wow thanks nozrami for the help . are you sure your circuit can drive irfp250 without heating . with my experience with discreet ucd R1 in your schematic needs to be of a high value or the output will heat like crazy. why haven't you include the op-amp preamp section is the gain sufficient enough? thanks for the simulation man GOD almighty bless you big time.

  8. #8
    diysmps Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Langata Rongai, Rift Valley, Kenya, Kenya
    Posts
    380
    BTW nozrami does driving the irfp250 with small bjts like in my schema above q22 ,q14 ,q6 , q3 help in any way in terms of power output and t.h.d?

  9. #9
    diysmps Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, MY
    Posts
    571
    yes R1 need to set high, its original schema, btw Stewin, im trying to build this one but not finish yet. For your schema, i`ll do some research let me see what we can do.

  10. #10
    diysmps Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Kuala Lumpur, MY
    Posts
    571
    Oo, as i can see ur schema is more better and include op -amp, i`ll try simulate it, and tell u the result

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •